Apparently When You’re a Big Site, it pays to not implement rel=”alternate” hreflang=”x”

2 Flares Twitter 1 Facebook 0 Google+ 1 Reddit 0 Filament.io 2 Flares ×

Trip Advisor is a pretty big website with some really great, useful content for travellers looking to book accommodation, so it’s no mystery you’d see them a lot in SERPs for highly competitive travelling keyword verticals.

With such a valuable search asset on their hands, you’d expect them to have SEO best practices pretty much down pat, right?

Here is a result for ‘Slovenia Hotels’ (location – Sydney, no personalised search or history):

hreflang duplicate results

 

The first 3 organic results are taken up Trip Advisor’s Australian, US and UK site’s respectively, while another large travel accommodation website Booking.com comes in at number 4 and has only one listing ranked on the front page.

What is Going on Here?

Here are comparison screenshots for each Trip Advisor webpage:

Tripadvisor duplicate content

 

Pretty clear case of duplicate content!

Of course, each page is taken from different, location-specific domains and companies are perfectly entitled to have different websites targeting different geographic audiences. Google understands this and has a neat little way to prevent a nasty duplicate content penalty from hitting big international websites with useful content – rel=”alternate” hreflang=”x”. This markup allows the webmaster to specify to Google which website is intended to target which audience.

Example:

If I have two SEO websites, one targeting visitors in Australia and one for the UK, with largely identical content and small variations such as currency denominations and office locations, I should implement the following:

<link rel=”alternate” hreflang=”en-AU” href=”http://www.theseotailor.com/au/” />

<link rel=”alternate” hreflang=”en-BR” href=”http://www.theseotailor.com/br/” />

 

However, I checked the sourcecode for the Trip Adviser pages and hreflang has not been implemented:

 

rel=alternate

 

 

Now compare to the sourcecode for the Booking.com page:

Booking.com rel-alternate

 

Both sites are in good contention for top rankings, however, it seems in this case that Trip Advisor has been able to dominate the top 3 results by NOT implementing href=lang, either intentionally or by blissful ignorance. It is impossible to say whether Booking.com would also been given multiple ranking positions for different geographic domains, though comparing it to Trip Advisor, I would not say it is out of the question. The multiple rankings give it a great authority boost, though there may be some user experience issues with being served essentially the same content 3 times.

I do however think that only websites in the league of Bookings.com and Tripadviser.com could get away with this at the moment – a smaller website would almost certainly be hit by a duplicate content penalty.

 

 

 

2 Flares Twitter 1 Facebook 0 Google+ 1 Reddit 0 Filament.io 2 Flares ×

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please type the characters of this captcha image in the input box

Please type the characters of this captcha image in the input box

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>